[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Artistic License 2.0 -> copyright file



On 20/09/15 22:10, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi,

i'm packaging r-cran-bms which is released under the Artistic-2.0
license, but i'm never quite sure what to put in the copyright file. for
GPL2, GPL2+, etc. i just go and find an existing package, and pillage
it's copyright file, i.e.:

==========

Files: *
Copyright: 2010-2013 Martin Feldkircher, Stefan Zeugner
License: GPL-2

License: GPL-2
  This program is free software; you can redistribute it
  and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
  License as published by the Free Software Foundation;
  version 2.
  .
  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
  useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
  warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
  PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for more
  details.
  .
  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
  License along with this package; if not, write to the Free
  Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor,
  Boston, MA  02110-1301 USA
  .
  On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU General Public
  License version 2 can be found in the file
  `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.

===========

but this is not the same as the content of the license itself. this is a
statement that the file is licensed under GPL2. i'm looking for the
equivalent 'blurb' if you like, for the Artistic license 2.0, but
whenever i google it, i just get the license itself.

any tips on how i track down/create the appropriate blurb?

with thanks

jonathon


Very few license actually have a short statement like the one you quote for the GPL-2. For the others, including Artistic-2.0, the full content of the license must be copy-pasted verbatim in d/copyright.

Ghis


Reply to: