Hi,
The changes look ok to me.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:15:46AM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> > > that's my first package. I don't know what would be required to change
> > > the name in the ITP and the git repository?
> >
> > You wouldn't need to change anything there - the source package name
> > should stay as it is called upstream, and the ITP bug and the git
> > repository are named after the source package (the source package is the
> > union of the orig.tar.gz, the .debian.tar.xz and the .dsc. The binary
> > packages are the generated .deb files).
> >
> > The only thing that would need changing would be the Package: field in
> > debian/control and possibly currently existing debian/gpaw-setup.*
> > files, which would be renamed to debian/gpaw-data.*. Finally, I assume
> > gpaw Depends/Build-Depends on gpaw-setups, so its dependencies would
> > have to be adjusted as well.
> >
>
> i tried to make these changes. Please verify if they look OK.
However, it seem the gpaw-setups package does not install the data files
anywhere, if I build the package, it is empty. This is either a
left-over bug from renaming the package or, (more likely because there
is upstream build system and nothing obvious handling it in debian/) an
oversight.
I assume the files should go into /usr/share/gpaw? Is there some way to
tell gpaw where it should look for its data files by default?
Michael