Re: Bug#746805: transition: gfortran module version changing from 10 to 12
I'd be happy to push the netcdfc package to alioth tomorrow. Do
cdftools and flexpart require the Fortran or C++ bindings as well?
(Those are now separate packages.)
Cheers,
Nico
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Alastair McKinstry
<alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie> wrote:
>
> On 03/05/2014 21:18, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>>
>> GCC 4.9 changes the module version for fortran 90 code from 10 to 12. A test
>> rebuild of GCC 4.9 only shows good results when a package doesn't build-depend
>> on another package having the same gfortran module version. Asking first the
>> maintainers of gfortran based software to test-rebuild these packages, then
>> giving feedback about the viability of gfortran-4.9 as the default gfortran
>> version for jessie.
>>
>> So please build the build-dependencies of these packages, and then these
>> packages themself with gfortran-4.9.
>>
>> cdftools
>> elkcode
>> flexpart
>> slepc
>
> cdftools and flexpart depend on netcdf, which is currently at 4.1.3.
> In mail
> <CAK6Z60c2+myo_s0qeJZoMJRWszmBgcu2_kZPwmW67A-pGbBsag@mail.gmail.com>
> to debian-devel, Nico Schlomer points out he is packaging the lastest
> netcdf, 4.3.2, which
> has reorganised netcdf significantly and is testing it.
> So perhaps it would be good to synchronise these changes. I will upload
> new versions
> of cdftools and flexpart when netcdf has moved to 4.3.2+
>
>
>> Please follow-up with results to this bug report.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@sceal.ie>, <mckinstry@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
> A decent provision for the poor is the true test of civilization.
> ~Samuel Johnson, Boswell: Life of Johnson
>
Reply to: