[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi,



A Dijous, 31 de juliol de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:07:54PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have worked in the octomap package following the ftp-master
> > > > advices. I have a lintian warning  about:
> > > >
> > > > debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle
> 
> That's currently my most hated lintian warning - lintian is simply wrong
> here since uscan knows the Files-Excluded feature.  There are some
> devscripts/uscan bugs/discussions around this.
> 
> > > Does something like the following patch work for your problem?
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
> > > index ff4a10c..9a324ac 100644
> > > --- a/debian/watch
> > > +++ b/debian/watch
> > > @@ -3,7 +3,5 @@
> > >  version=3
> > > 
> > >  # For GitHub projects you can use the tags page:
> > > -opts=uversionmangle=s/$/+dfsg/ \
> > > +opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// \
> > >   https://github.com/OctoMap/octomap/tags .*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz
> > > -
> > 
> > Good!!!!!!
> 
> ... to suppress the lintian warning ... but bad if it comes to
> downloading a properly named orig tarball.  Please revert this and
> ignore the lintian warning.
>  
> > Please Andreas, could you push it again? Jose modified your propose of 
debian 
> > watch. Really, you were testing us ;-)
> 
> This time it's not me who is testing you, sorry. ;-)

:-(


> You can verify this by just trying
> 
>    uscan --verbose --force-download --repack --compress xz
> 
> and see how the result will be named (in both cases).

Andreas propose, two files:
- octomap_1.6.6+dfsg.orig.tar.xz with the deleted files and dfsg modification
- v1.6.6.tar.gz the original from upstream.

Jose propose, two files:
- octomap_1.6.6.orig.tar.xz with the deleted files and dfsg modification
- v1.6.6.tar.gz the original from upstream.

change reverted and pushed. I have tried to overrive the warning without 
success.

> Feel free to file a bug report against lintian / discuss this on
> debian-devel.

I will prefer that no. You did it, there's an open bug and I follow your 
steps.

So, please Andreas, check it again and cross your fingers that will pass ftp-
master filter.

Thanks for all,

Leopold

-- 
--
Linux User 152692     PGP: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: