[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)



A Dilluns, 4 de novembre de 2013, Andreas Tille va escriure:
> Hi Leopold,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > > If it is helpful for you there is no rule that would forbid to keep the
> > > entries.  I just heard from ftpmaster that they might become distracted
> > > to read irrelevant stuff and I personally like to keep their workload as
> > > small as possible.  I'm not sure whether this opinion is valid these
> > > days any more.  So if you really think it is helpful - this will not
> > > stop me from sponsering in the end.
> > 
> > yes, to me it's helpfull. However I doubt about the first version of the 
> > package to put in debian. The "normal" thing should be -1, not -5.
> 
> Yes, please let the first Debian upload be *-1.

done.

> > > > >     What is the rationale for this?  Usually it should not be 
needed.
> > > > >   - Please give
> > > > >        cme fix dpkg-control
> > > > >     a try.  I guess you will like the result.
> > > > 
> > > > First of all, I must admit that I don't understand what are you asking 
me 
> > with 
> > > > the dpkg-control. 
> > > 
> > > Well, the usage of configmodel has nothing to do with Pre-Depends or 
> > lintian.
> > > It is just a unique formatting (that's why I used different items im my 
> > list).
> > 
> > So? I'm sorry Andreas, but I still don't understand you ....
> 
> So if you do not understand you obviously did not tried what I
> suggested.  Any reason not to do it and `git stash` it if I was
> wrong in assuming that you will like it?

Ok, understood. Used: cme fix dpkg-control and pushed. Also reformat all the 
changelog entries to a more compact format.

> > > Well, due to the missing pristine-tar I did not yet builded the package.
> > > I have no idea what (possible false positives) lintian is producing in
> > > pedantic mode (and I actually do not use this lintian level).  Your
> > > debian/ dir does not contain any preinst maintainer script and so
> > > (without testing) I simply assume that lintian is wrong here.  The
> > > Pre-Depends field should be *realy* rarely used and +pedantic lintian
> > > messages are a weak reason to do so.  Please re-read the docs when
> > > Pre-Depends should really be used.
> > 
> > Ok, I can review it. I will ask to the dpkg maintainer (a catalan guy too 
;-) 
> 
> Let us know the result of your research.

Guillem told me that lintian >= 2.5.11. should not complain and from wheezy, 
although it's correct it's not needed.

> > > OK.  Just ping me - favourably via an entry at SoB Wiki page.  I just
> > > verified that after my changes the package arrived at the according
> > > tasks page[1].
> > 
> > Well, just done. I had the upstream branch with the needed tag, but no the 
> > pristine-tar branch. I hope that it would be ok now.
> 
> OK, pulled pristine-tar branch and tried to build the package.  Went
> fine until autotest:
> 
> ...
> [100%] Built target demo_StateSampling
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/buildd/ompl-0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4/build'
> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_start 
/tmp/buildd/ompl-0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4/build/CMakeFiles 0
> make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/buildd/ompl-0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4/build'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ompl-0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4'
>    dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=cmake -O--parallel
> dh_auto_test: error: unable to chdir to obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> E: Failed autobuilding of package

Ok, please could you tried again?

I don't understand why this fails. I use another build directory and that's 
the problem, because I can build it. I have set it in the dh command line.

%:
+        dh $@ --builddirectory=build --buildsystem=cmake --parallel
-        dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake --parallel

Regards,

Leopold


> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20131104072348.GA23804@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20131104072348.GA23804@an3as.eu
> 
> 


-- 
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: