Re: Stupid fumble with bug numbers

[Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net>]

Le 17/03/2013 10:10, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> Sylvestre Ledru<sylvestre@debian.org>  writes:
> > On 17/03/2013 09:56, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > > That is what I did to reopen the bug ; but for closing the real one, is
> > > it the best course of action?
> > you can do:
> > 702898-done@bugs.debian.org
>
> Ideally with a "Version:<version>" header at the beginning of the
> message so the BTS knows in which version the bug was fixed.

I didn't do that.

> > or mail control@bugs.debian.org
> > with
> > fixed 702898<version>
> > thanks
>
> Marking a bug as fixed alone in a version doesn't close the bug.

I mostly did that, but added a message after thanks (--) for the user. I 
understand it doesn't close the bug but only marks it as fixed in a 
particular version.

Sylvestre also said:
>> Update it in the changelog, the next upload will fix the issue.

Which I interpreted as saying the bug would be closed by the next upload 
if the changelog entry was modified (which I did).

So in short, the three things I did up to now are:
- reopen the other bug
- mark the bug as fixed in 4.0.1-2
- modify the changelog in the git repository

Is it enough?

Snark on #debian-science