Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs

To: Brendon Higgins <blhiggins@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org, Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>, Oz Nahum Tiram <nahumoz@gmail.com>, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
From: Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez@kitware.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:38:44 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] CABAUzPrphhHvbnQnW7uDJtOeZb8U2TjWG3LeveZchYTLffJLGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201205291455.18362.blhiggins@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20120529060057.GC18760@an3as.eu> <[🔎] CADKMUwm_iJLK15dLaK142u8Si2Fpqe4PtrX6oUmUTztHkR7yZg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20120529180732.GO11168@onerussian.com> <[🔎] 201205291455.18362.blhiggins@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Brendon Higgins <blhiggins@gmail.com> wrote:

Ideally the whole system should be open, not just the chunk of code unique to
each experiment.

+1 Luis

Reply to:

References:
- [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
  - From: Oz Nahum Tiram <nahumoz@gmail.com>
- Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
  - From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
- Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
  - From: Brendon Higgins <blhiggins@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
Next by Date: Re: RFS: palp/2.1-1
Previous by thread: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
Next by thread: Re: [OT - or may be not] The case for open computer programs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread