Re: RE : ntl

To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RE : ntl
From: "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:05:30 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110810100530.GA18450@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAE2SPAYHwQdyzSYHHvEU1yHfsT=+L-2EqTc6MG1eLEJGwtWfnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAE2SPAbreCiZ_iUqm852ZFOakje_nQmad0h3QKTekxwTaykOmA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20110809150336.GA9021@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de> <[🔎] CAE2SPAYHwQdyzSYHHvEU1yHfsT=+L-2EqTc6MG1eLEJGwtWfnA@mail.gmail.com>

* roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+debian@gmail.com> [110810 00:09]:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Bernhard R. Link <brlink@debian.org> wrote:
> > I think the behaviour ntl is using (some assembler on i386 to unset and
> > restore the CPU bit to control this behaviour) looks itself sane
> > (assuming it is only relevant on i386).
>
> Not sane. Think about using another lib that need to use long double.

Which other lib would want to do floating point operations between the
start and the end of one of the functions of quad_float.c ?

	Bernhard R. Link

Reply to:

References:
- RE : ntl
  - From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>
- Re: RE : ntl
  - From: "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@debian.org>
- Re: RE : ntl
  - From: roucaries bastien <roucaries.bastien+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RE : ntl
Next by Date: Re: ntl
Previous by thread: Re: RE : ntl
Next by thread: RE : Re: RE : ntl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread