Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> writes: > While I *personally* do not have a problem with the current situation I > agree with Sylvestre that currently debian-science@l.d.o is not kind of > missing link between developers and users. Because I think we should > establish such a place and this list seems to be a good candidate it > might be reasonable to move pure packaging related questions to the > Alioth list. > > However, I do not see a practical way to force this policy on list members. > So writing it explicitely down in the Debian Science policy document and > kindly directing people to the other list might be a good idea but there > is no way to forbid packaging questions here. Hopefully not muddying the waters, but a new "debian-science-users" list could be created and "debian-science" left for package concerns (or package/user overlap?). The new list would have the advantage of being explicitly user-centric in name. It would also be a fresh place to intice back any users that may have left this list due to the increased focus on packaging. The downsides are having yet-another-list, and that purely user-oriented folks that are still here would need to move. 2c, -Brett.
Attachment:
pgp5MVnstk9RY.pgp
Description: PGP signature