Re: Bug#637397: Possible solutions

[Alastair McKinstry <alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie>]

On 2011-08-29 07:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Steve M. Robbins<steve@sumost.ca>  wrote:
> > I think the rest of this thread got off onto a tangent.  In my mind,
> > the germane question is not why Paraview embeds a patched VTK source
> > tree but, rather: why is the paraview binary package now installing
> > the VTK tools like vtkWrapPython?
> Indeed, that's the actual issue. Thanks Steve.
>
> > Why does a running paraview binary need vtkWrapPython?
> That was also my initial question.
>
> > Can it be stuck into /usr/lib/paraview to avoid the conflict?
> I believe the only outstanding issue is that VTK 5.8 is not released
> yet. Therefore vtkWrapPython* tools from ParaView 3.10 are much more
> advanced (more options) than that of VTK 5.6.
I am also awaiting VTK 5.8 for VisIt packaging. Perhaps we should consider
doing an vtk5.8 package in experimental, to discover issues and report them
ahead of time to VTK / VisIT / Paraview developers ?


--
Alastair McKinstry  ,<alastair@sceal.ie>  ,<mckinstry@debian.org>     http://blog.sceal.ie

Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.