[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [R-sig-hpc] License of GotoBLAS was changed to BSD



I am now working on a removing of bug.
# The known bug on Win64 now.

2011/1/25 Soeren Sonnenburg <sonne@debian.org>:
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:44 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> On 26 November 2010 at 23:10, Thomas Weber wrote:
>> | On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:53:09AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> | > Wouldn't we want GotoBLAS2 in Debian now that it is BSD-licensed?
>> |
>> | Uh, are you guys aware of
>> | http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/faq/ ?
>> |
>> | "GotoBLAS is no longer under active development."
>>
>> We do.
>>
>> The whole BSD release is presumably of consequence of Mr Goto no longer being
>> at U of Texas and working on it.
>>
>> But by getting it into Debian we also give it more exposure and who knows
>> maybe some other folks will pick it up. In the meantime its performance is
>> still better than Atlas in most cases (as e.g. shown in my benchmarking paper
>> / blog posts -- see http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/code/gcbd/
>
> Is there any news / progress on this?
>
> Seems like goto blas2 is really fast and worth the effort
>
> http://mikiobraun.tumblr.com/post/2795371079/jblas-1-2-0-with-gotoblas2-22-gflops-peak-vs-14-gflops
>
> Soeren
> --
> For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it
> will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
>



-- 
EI-JI Nakama  <nakama (a) ki.rim.or.jp>
"\u4e2d\u9593\u6804\u6cbb"  <nakama (a) ki.rim.or.jp>


Reply to: