Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] petsc3.1 using lam instead of openmpi ? incompatilbity with boost::mpi...

["Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@debian.org>]

Thanks Adam for your very quick answer !

I was  quite worried in fact and now I am relieved :)

I'll upload a new slepc and life tomorrow

I am still angry at the PETSc guys, they made again very slight changes to their interface

and it breaks slepc and life. 

It is not big deal (at least from what I have seen) but it is a pain to maintain all these changes of interfaces (< 2.3, 2.3 3.0 3.1 ...)

Best regards

C.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@debian.org> wrote:

On second thought, I'll put a compatibility link from base to variables
to make reverse-depends just work.

Apologies again for the LAM issue!