Hi Christophe, On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > Adam, > > I certainly missed some emails but the recent petsc3.1 upload compiled > with > lam (and not the default openmi) provoked a massive breakage on my > side: > slepc and life (which uses also slepc). Oh no! That's my fault, I was testing a couple of packages to fix build issues with LAM, and must have left the alternative pointing to it. Sorry about that. > I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi > compiled (build-depending on) with mpi-default-dev (as well as life) > and combining code linked with lam and openmpi generates a nice > segfault > > is there a place explaining the situation and how to fix my software ? > I read the discussions on mpi and the move to mpich2 and openmpi > but did not find guidelines I'll fix and re-upload now. But the file $PETSCDIR/conf/base is no longer part of PETSc as of 3.1, so change "base" to "variables" in the reverse-depends and you should get what you need. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part