[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: MPI implementations in squeeze



On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:49:20PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I understand the final state of the modern Debian infrastructure for MPI
> is now in place (modulo the questions around deprecating MPICH and LAM).
> That is, the disruptive Open MPI transition is now complete, correct?

Yes, so far as I know.  There might be the occasional need for a binNMU as
MPICH2 settles in and if mpi-default-dev switches to MPICH2 instead of LAM as
the backup, but those shouldn't interfere with testing migration.

> >From the point of view of a client package, what is now best practice
> for working with MPI?  Is there a website/wiki/document explaining how
> to set up an MPI-using package, or is it just a matter of RTFM from
> mpi-default-dev?
> 
> For context, gerris includes MPI support which is currently switched
> off. I would like to create an additional gerris-mpi package which has
> MPI switched on.

No particular documentation that I'm aware of, though it's a good thought....

If you just want one MPI package, it should be enough to Build-Depend on
mpi-default-dev and perform a build of your package with whatever flags are
necessary -- which ideally should be something simple like "configure
--enable-mpi CC=mpicc".



-- 
Nicholas Breen
nbreen@ofb.net


Reply to: