Re: MPI implementations in squeeze
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:19:11AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 16:47 -0800, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> > * is it too late in the release cycle to propose this as a release goal?
> > should squeeze+1 be the target instead? squeeze+2?
>
> I think it's too late for squeeze, but squeeze+1 should definitely be
> doable.
How many packages are affected? Squeeze freeze is several months away
still. I am not sure about release-goal freeze, but even then, it could
be considered an inofficial release goal among debian-science at least.
Michael
Reply to: