Re: gfortran FFLAGS without paths?
Hi,
uh, sorry, that should read "FLIBS" instead of "FFLAGS", everywhere.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:04:58PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining GNU Octave in Debian. I'm facing a problem with the fact
> that it consists of both C++ and Fortran and I better state that I don't
> know Fortran. Octave's FFLAGS as determined by configure are (breaks added
> for better readibility)
>
> checking for Fortran 77 libraries of gfortran...
> -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.2
> -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.2/../../../../lib
> -L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/../lib
> -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.2/../../..
> -lhdf5 -lz -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm
>
>
> Is there a chance of getting rid of the "-L" paths there, that is it is
> a) possible without crude hacks?
> b) sensible?
>
> These flags are hardcoded with the compiler flags into one of Octave's
> scripts. If the compiler version changes later on, I have a problem,
> that's why I'm asking. See e.g.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348472
>
> Thanks
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: