Am Sonntag, den 12.10.2008, 13:53 +0200 schrieb Michael Banck: > Personally, I think this (both a dh_* script and debconf) is > overengineering. > > If we want to have files in /usr/share/doc/<package>, why can't we just > use dh_installdocs for now? If we want to provide just citation information, this is enough for sure. If we want to provide something like a citation database in one or several bibliographic formats, dh_installdocs is IMHO not sufficient and will lead to chaos. But I'm happy to be proven wrong. ;) Starting with dh_installdocs for now is of course reasonable. Having a citation database would be a long-term goal. Sorry for being unclear about that. Best regards Manuel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil