Re: Proposal: Bits from Debian-science
- To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Bits from Debian-science
- From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:07:19 +0200
- Message-id: <20080802110719.GB4273@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
- In-reply-to: <6m63qlhbe0.fsf_-_@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- References: <20080629125542.GB11807@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806291621520.6403@wr-linux02> <20080629164623.GA26885@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20080629180358.GB26885@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20080726233220.GA24453@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0807270929530.9591@wr-linux02> <aefba0690807310526r2ffa41d5t7e89ff2b2529bed9@mail.gmail.com> <aefba0690807310526r2ffa41d5t7e89ff2b2529bed9@mail.gmail.com> <85b5c3130807310542wdba2181ncb2c09ea5bf0b84e@mail.gmail.com> <6m63qlhbe0.fsf_-_@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:39:03AM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
> "Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Christophe Prud'homme
> > <prudhomm@debian.org> wrote:
> > >>> At the same time, I am wondering why abinit got uploaded to pkg-scicomp
> > >>> without consulting the debichem team first?
> > > simple and honest answer: we didn't know about debichem.
>
> [snip]
> >
> > As Christophe said, I also don't follow all lists, it's just
> > impossible.
>
> Indeed.
>
> What I think would be useful is "Bits from..." mails from
> debian-science etc. If nothing else, it would increase the profile of
> science in Debian.
One question: What is the target? Will you send it to
debian-devel-announce or just to debian-science (and notify DPN and
Debian Times for wider outreach)?
Michael
Reply to: