Le dimanche 18 mai 2008 à 16:14 +0200, Manuel Prinz a écrit : > Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2008 15:56:11 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > > > Looking at the current situation, the repositories are quite > > > unstructured: The SVN repo contains the tasks created by Sylvestre and > > > some packages checked in at the same level which is quite confusing. > > > > It is temporary. We have to move them into the appropriate category. > > OK. I just thought this was due to some misunderstanding by the people who > checked those in. My fault! Thanks for your work an that! No worries, David Bremner has to decided which category would be the best. > > > Since we do not know if we will move to one repository or keep both > > > running forever, I'd prefer to have the same repository layout in both > > > VCSs. > > > > Yep, I agree with you. It is a work in progress. > > Sure. I just thought we could get this organized in a flexible way right from > the start, so we can focus on the "progress" more than on the "work". ;) > > Anyway, I was not criticizing your work, sorry if that came out wrong! I didn't take this way :) I noticed how you work in the Debian OpenMPI team and that you are only trying to make thing better ! > > Here are a few ideas behind the idea of category into the repository. > > For example if someone just want to just checkout package from the > > category he is interested in > > Facilitate the involvement of people dedicated to a specific category. > > Those are of course valid points, though I still think that is something that > can be generated from the meta-information that is already available. Writing > a script for that should be fairly trivial and I'd be happy to do so! Does anyone else has an opinion on this ? Andreas ? Charles ? > I'm also very open to the format. I like DocBook but LaTeX may be more common > in the scientific world. I do not have experience with LaTeX and HTML; my > DocBook experience if very good when it comes to providing documentation in > various formats. If you prefer something different, please let me know! (This > should be a group effort anyway, I just try to start it.) Personnaly, I don't care about the format. I care about the content (just like SVN/git). ;) Sylvestre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=