> I rejected your debian-science project request because I simply don't see > the point of it compared to the existing pkg-science. You can do much more > than packaging even behind the pkg-science umbrella. pkg-science is just a > Unix group associated to the resources that you have available on > alioth.debian.org, you're free to use the name "Debian Science" in all the > rest of your communication... No worries, I understand your point of view ;) Anyway, I am happy with pkg-science. > What I see here is a lot of pointless discussions and lack of some > leadership to take a decision. As the pkg-science administrator, you > could have made it clear that your offered pkg-science as a generic > umbrella rather than suggesting people to use pkg-scicomp and maybe your > could have built some consensus sooner. I am not a DD; I have less legitimacy than Andreas Tille (for example) or other DDs to decide this kind of thing. Sylvestre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=