Re: debian-science and science-* packages
- To: Debian science <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: debian-science and science-* packages
- From: Frederic Lehobey <Frederic@Lehobey.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:17:53 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070905151753.GC7802@melusine.lehobey.net>
- In-reply-to: <ddc052a90708240830v6701138aue2eaadb98934ed3c@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707191526180.32154@wr-linux02> <20070824140944.GA6517@melusine.lehobey.net> <ddc052a90708240830v6701138aue2eaadb98934ed3c@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@gmail.com> (2007-08-24 08:30:24) :
> 1) Should these metapackages Recommend instead of Depending on the
> real ones? I see that is what the education-* metapackages do and
> presumably they have some reason for it.
Already addressed by Andreas.
> 2) Maybe these metapackages could Suggest the corresponding
> education-* metapackages.
I do not see the clear benefit either (notice they are mentioned when
relevant in the package descriptions).
> 3) science-physics should definitely recommend root-system once that's
> out of experimental.
Done.
Thanks for your feedback,
Frédéric Lehobey
Reply to: