Re: mpqc
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:52:35PM -0800, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Was latest version of MPQC (2.3.1-1) for amd64
> compiled for libint?
Not to my knowledge.
> Having locked 2.3.1-0.2 (compiled for libint), I can't check. However,
> I see the 2.3.1.1 for i386 was not compiled for libint. Is the same
> for amd64? email inquiry to the maintainer returned undelivered.
Can you be more specific? I got your bug report about this (#409025)
which you sent after this mail exchange on this list, but I cannot find
any other mail by you.
> It is only libint that allows R12 procedures. I wish
> any release for amd64 is compiled for libint (i386
> can't be powerful enough for R12).
Etch is frozen now, so wish-list items like this will have to wait till
after its release.
> Also, I wish compilation is for acml libraries, or an
> optional compilation this way is given for amd64.
>
> All that (simple indeed for an expert maintainer) to
> keep mpqc at the level it can attain. At present, on
> debian repositories, it is not.
MPQC indeed could need some love, but it's too late for Etch now, sorry.
I hope that Etch+1 will have better MPQC packages.
cheers,
Michael
Reply to: