[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How much interest in a "debian-science.org" repository?

On 7/20/06, Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu> wrote:
Dear list,

Currently there are a fair number of repositories of science-related
unofficial Debian packages out there.  I've been thinking that it might
make sense to consolidate them into a single site.  This would have
several advantages:

- Permit convenient one-stop "shopping" for unofficial scientific .debs
with only one sources.list entry (well, two counting deb-src)

- Better PR for the unofficial .debs.  Instead of a dozen different
unofficial repositories, now only one would need to be publicized,
perhaps with an obvious name like "www.debian-science.org".

- Possibility of more complicated dependency graphs between unofficial

- Possibility (someday) to set up a buildd network that can autobuild
all the packages for various architectures

- Testbed for packages that ultimately can enter Debian proper

- Convenient unofficial source for packages that can't enter Debian, for
whatever reason, as long as the maintainers had permission to distribute

I was talking to Brett Viren about the possibility to host CLHEP and
GEANT4 .debs at his site, maintaining a repository for unofficial
physics related packages.  So the question is, would other Debian
Scientists, in fields other than physics, also be interested in using
this repository?

The idea needs a lot of setup so probably not much will happen
immediately; this email is mainly to gauge the amount of interest.

best regards,

Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/    Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751                 Princeton, NJ 08544

I can help build the i386 and x86-64 packages.

LI Daobing

Reply to: