Fwd: Bug#1028958: RFS: scm/5f3-3 [Team] -- Scheme language interpreter
Hi team!
Maybe I am missing something here, The #1026844 has existed there for
a long time,
I am not sure if the patch is working. I mean, although it can be
built on s390x and mips64el,
but it's function is not sure.
Now I have uploaded the new version package to mentors. Reviewing and
comment it will be appreciated.
Thanks.
BR,
Bo
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 6:09 PM
Subject: Bug#1028958: RFS: scm/5f3-3 [Team] -- Scheme language interpreter
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scm":
* Package name : scm
Version : 5f3-3
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : https://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/SCM.html
* License : GFDL-1.3+, LGPL-3+, GPL-3+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/scheme-team/scm
Section : interpreters
The source builds the following binary packages:
scm - Scheme language interpreter
libscm-dev - Embeddable library for SCM Scheme language interpreter
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/scm/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scm/scm_5f3-3.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
scm (5f3-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
.
* Fix ftbfs on riscv64, s390x, mips64el. Closes: #1026844, #387087
--
Regards,
--
Bo YU
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=oceD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: