Re: slib and Schemes
Nick Gasson <nick@nickg.me.uk> writes:
> On 10/08/20 23:56 pm, Göran Weinholt wrote:
>>
>> It's an interesting approach that turns my assumptions on their head. Do
>> you think it will work better than generating them in the postinsts of
>> the cooperating Schemes? It'll be easier for you to make sure that it
>> works in all supported Schemes, but you get more work to do yourself in
>> slib. Seems like a good idea if it works.
>
> I'm not sure which way is best. It seems the same code either needs to
> all go centrally in the slib postinst or distributed in each Scheme's
> postinst. To me it seems more straightforward to put it all in the slib
> package, as the logic is largely the same for each Scheme and it makes
> tasks like moving all the catalog files to a central location easier.
All good points. And if it breaks, it is slib that got broken and the
bug will be filed against slib, which seems very appropriate. If you
think that you can make it work then I'm all for it, at least as
maintainer of the chezscheme package.
--
Göran Weinholt | https://weinholt.se/
Debian Developer | 73 de SA6CJK
Reply to: