Re: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian

To: Pranav P <pranav.p7@ibm.com>
Cc: Berli Gayathri <Gayathri.Berli@ibm.com>, "1101694@bugs.debian.org" <1101694@bugs.debian.org>, debian-s390 <debian-s390@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian
From: Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 08:16:10 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] CAD+GYvxu4F5+on1G_K6OQ2ZKyaGhJ0e4kMxJ-ypMeG5pYOU9iw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CH2PR15MB35434D1C261D9DC086939AD9A08D2@CH2PR15MB3543.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAD+GYvwpOMBC_c1Az5XPKsiU3mijC5_JnEn_df1MhimK5dyD5g@mail.gmail.com> <SA1PR15MB44683BAFFF259F63A2C46FAB94AC2@SA1PR15MB4468.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <CAD+GYvxGWhS0OVrby2caHARwJMOPFh-1N9ei2ngyFVu6QEn15Q@mail.gmail.com> <SA1PR15MB44687E4BFA4BF821A74E40DD94BA2@SA1PR15MB4468.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <[🔎] CH2PR15MB35434D1C261D9DC086939AD9A08D2@CH2PR15MB3543.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 8:01 AM Pranav P <pranav.p7@ibm.com> wrote:
> It seems like when `simple_setters_caller` calls `simple_setter_caller<void*>` this function calls `gi_marshalling_tests_properties_accessors_object_set_flags` with `arg->v_pointer` as the `some_flags` where `some_flags` is an `enum` and arg->v_pointer is of `void*` (Actually it's a gpointer but is getting casted to void*).

Thank you for your analysis. Are you able to send these details
upstream to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gjs/-/issues/685 ?

Jeremy Bícha

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian
  - From: Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>

References:
- RE: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian
  - From: Pranav P <pranav.p7@ibm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian
Next by Date: Bug#1104743: cpuinfo not supported on ppc64el nor s390x
Previous by thread: RE: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian
Next by thread: Re: Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread