Control: tag -1 + pending On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:26:51PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 23:59:21 +0100 Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> wrote: > ... > > > > Is there a way I could test FCP installation? As far as I understand > > there is no emulation of a zFCP-like setup anywhere right, and you'd > > need to have access to a zFCP controller? > > > > (Which are harder to partition/segment than DASD-based storage…) > ... > > Thanks for pushing the patches! > > I don't know of FCP emulation either. To test the module, you would > indeed have to have a zFCP HBA defined plus the necessary storage > network setup (with zoning/LUN masking) configured. > > As I already have tested Hendrik's original patchset, building off of > the d-i repository will probably not lead to new insights. I could > however offer to re-run tests once a udeb is built for s390-fcp. > If I can provide additional info (logs of an install, screenshots, ...), > I'd be more than happy to do so. Going forward I am concerned with any possibility to regression test this. I'd be helpful to arrange access for a crash-and-burn VM with a zFCP HBA attached somewhere. (I know that this is difficult because it also requires more elaborate storage zoning.) The other case I'm wondering about is how well the installer will handle the non-presence of DASDs and the co-existence of both. In other news I just pushed the package to Debian NEW. There might be concerns about the proper labeling of the license, in which case we need to iterate a bit. But the package itself looked ready to upload. Kind regards and thanks Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature