On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:35:29PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > > we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release > > architectures for the Wheezy release. > > > > Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of > > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, > > as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us > > determine s390's status for the release. > *prod* just in case anyone did have any comments... Not really. For wheezy I don't see a problem releasing with s390. For wheezy+1 it might not make sense, due to upstreams dropping s390 support and the fact that few people use the 31bit toolchain. With three buildds we're pretty much redundant now, package building is generally very fast. OTOH this arch is already marked as "yes" anyway… ;-) Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature