Re: Bug#569594: git t7400.24 is failing again
tags 569594 + unreproducible
quit
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:18:59AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > ok s390 (lxdebian) 1.6.6.1 2010-01-28
> > ok s390 (zandonai) 1.6.5-1~bpo50+1 2010-02-01
> > FAIL s390 (zandonai) 1.7.0~rc2 2010-02-13
> > ok s390 (debian-31) 1.7.0 2010-02-16
> > FAIL s390 (lxdebian) 1.7.0.2 2010-03-18
> > FAIL s390 (lxdebian) 1.7.0.3 2010-03-22
> ok s390 (hercules.local) 1.7.0.3 2010-03-26
>
> > I am trying to reproduce on S/390 with hercules, but it is very slow.
>
> Can’t reproduce here, unfortunately. Probably something in the buildd
> setup (available memory? threads?) triggers it.
Hi, I tried to reproduce the selftest failure on s390 and alpha
autobuilders in zelenka.d.o and albeniz.d.o sid chroots. The failure
did neither show up on zelenka, nor on albeniz. The logs are in
zelenka:~pape/log and albeniz:~pape/log respectively.
(sid)pape@zelenka:~/git-core-1.7.0.4$ tail -12 ../log
failed 0
broken 16
total 5412
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
make clean
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
rm -f -r 'trash directory'.* test-results
rm -f t????/cvsroot/CVSROOT/?*
rm -f -r valgrind/bin
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
(sid)pape@zelenka:~/git-core-1.7.0.4$
(sid)pape@albeniz:~/git-core-1.7.0.4$ tail -12 ../log
failed 0
broken 16
total 5412
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
make clean
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
rm -f -r 'trash directory'.* test-results
rm -f t????/cvsroot/CVSROOT/?*
rm -f -r valgrind/bin
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pape/git-core-1.7.0.4/t'
(sid)pape@albeniz:~/git-core-1.7.0.4$
I'm afraid, we can't do much without being able to reproduce this. Is
it possible to have access to an environment that's exactly the same as
the autobuilder's?
Regards, Gerrit.
Reply to: