[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#564897: marked as done (Missing gawk dependency for s390-tools)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:57:58 +0100
with message-id <201001241657.58930.elendil@planet.nl>
and subject line Bug#564897: Missing gawk dependency for s390-tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #564897,
regarding Missing gawk dependency for s390-tools
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

564897: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: s390-tools
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: important

Debian 5.0r3/s390 as guest of z/VM 5.4
Tasksel instructed to install a "standard system".

Upon reboot, some s390-tools command are unusable:

guigui@linux2:~$ sudo lsdasd
awk: not an option: --posix

guigui@linux2:~$ sudo lscss
Device   Subchan.  DevType CU Type Use  PIM PAM POM  CHPIDs
awk: line 14: regular expression compile failed (bad class -- [], [^] or [)
awk: line 14: syntax error at or near ]
awk: line 14: runaway regular expression /, "", CHND ...

Problem can be solved by installaing gawk.
Can gawk be added to the depedencies of s390-tools ?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: s390

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-s390 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages s390-tools depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.7-18     GNU C Library: Shared libraries

s390-tools recommends no packages.

s390-tools suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this report as it is a duplicate of #564893.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: