[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Orange-OpenSource/hurl] Add Hurl to official Debian repository



On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:16, Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.it> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:50:43AM -0800, Antonin Delpeuch wrote:
( https://github.com/Orange-OpenSource/hurl/issues/366#issuecomment-2691228495 )
wetneb left a comment (Orange-OpenSource/hurl#366)

I have made a [merge
request](https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/merge_requests/852)
for packaging libxml. Once this gets merged, someone needs to do
the upload, after which it will take a while for the package to go
through the NEW queue. Only after that we'll be able to do the same
dance for hurl


Hello Antonin,
Hello all others who see this email,


What is the further plan?

Yes, that is a honest question.
Thing is that I would like to help, but I can't help.
That is not completely true, I'm writing this email.


In the Debian changelog (
https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/merge_requests/852/diffs?file=10828e0258fa3697133c24f6d970e59f69569f89#diff-content-10828e0258fa3697133c24f6d970e59f69569f89
)
do I miss "Closes #NNNNNN" ( #NNNNNN the Intent To Package bugreport )

I could be wrong, that Debian Rust packages in "the huge debcargo repo"
don't need ITP bugreports. I don't know, it is the reason why I can't
help.  Hence my "What is the further plan?".

I do hope for a response like "I'm following the process described
at ...some_URL...".

Due  debian-rust@lists.debian.org in the CC, I hope
for a "Do follow procedure described at ....URL...."

Hi Geert,

we decided not to file ITPs per team policy (except for binary crates) as that pollutes the ML in our opinion. See [0]. As for hurl, someone™ (likely myself) will review the MR and then sponsor it. hurl can be maintain within the Rust team too if desired so.

Let me know if I can help with anything else.

best,

werdahias

Links:

[0]: https://rust-team.pages.debian.net/book/tips.html#itps


Reply to: