Hello team, A package I maintain [1], recently released its first version after being rewritten in Rust [2]. It's an executable binary, not a library. I'm happy to see that upstream has kept the set of dependencies small and manageable. One item is, however, missing in Debian still: ash [3]. Is ash something the Rust team has considered packaging? I've only had a cursory look, and it doesn't look too bad. Maybe I'm missing something. I'm happy to help out, but I'm very unfamiliar with the style of packaging the team uses. PS: The Rust packaging policy seems useful, but mostly focused on library crates. Are there any particular caveats or considerations I should keep in mind when moving ahead with this exectuable-only crate? [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/waypipe [2] https://mstoeckl.com/notes/code/waypipe_to_rust.html [3] https://lib.rs/crates/ash Best, Gard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature