Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t
[ debian-rust added to CC ]
Hi,
On 2024-03-12 11:03, Simon McVittie wrote:
> In the medium term, cargo needs re-bootstrapping on the affected
> architectures (armel and armhf, plus a bunch of -ports architectures
> where as far as I can see cargo was never available in the past) -
> that's #1065787, and Steve already replied to that bug describing how
> Ubuntu did this.
I don't think Ubuntu actually fixed cargo yet, at least if the data in
UDD is reliable -- and if I'm looking in the right place. :-)
udd=> select source,version,date from ubuntu_upload_history where source='cargo' order by date desc limit 2;
source | version | date
--------+--------------------------------------------+------------------------
cargo | 0.67.1+ds0ubuntu0.libgit2-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 | 2023-07-05 09:36:28+00
cargo | 0.67.1+ds0ubuntu0.libgit2-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 | 2023-07-05 09:36:27+00
(2 rows)
Maybe when Steve mentioned the work done in Ubuntu on
https://bugs.debian.org/1065787#22 he meant other packages?
> Is there a porter who can take responsibility for that?
I did manage to get cargo to build in a armhf chroot by manually
installing the various deps, see the build artifacts at
https://people.debian.org/~ema/cargo/. I can work on armel next. The
tests are green but maybe there's some more meaningful validation we can
do before uploading? Anyone from debian-rust has ideas or comments?
Reply to: