[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1056068: RFH: resvg -- SVG rendering library (command-line utility)



Quoting noisycoil@tutanota.com (2024-09-21 20:36:55)
> > Introduction of a binary package in another source package is not a reason
> > for rejection, as I understand it: That sounds like the only way to, well, doing
> > exactly that: Move a binary package to being maintained in another source
> > package.
> 
> Sure, but I would expect at least removal of the older source package from unstable first, or explicit consent from the previous maintainer to the overtake.
> 
> > So please go ahead and take over maintenance of these packages (if also
> > ok with the previous maintainer, Andrej Shadura, obviously), just make
> > sure that you take over all of it, not only the library parts.
> 
> I pushed the changes to debcargo-conf's current packaging of usvg/resvg needed to build the binaries to my personal repo: https://salsa.debian.org/NoisyCoil/debcargo-conf/-/commits/usvg-resvg. As far as the binaries are concerned, packaging-wise, only the manpages are missing (and proper d/changelog entries). C-library packages are not included as they are not built by neither package (nor they could be within debcargo-conf IIUC). Still, as I've already expressed in my last emails, I am not interested in maintaining the binaries. If Andrej, or tarzeau (both in cc), or really anyone else, is interested in doing so, they can just signal their interest and I'll add them to the Uploaders, add the manpages and re-upload the packages (again, through to my sponsor). Otherwise I see no value in re-uploading packages no-one is actually interested in maintaining, all the more if they were already removed from testing.

Noooo, no no - that's not how we are playing this!

Either you take over and you *maintain* the project, or you back off.

Doing a one-off release of the easy part - the library only, and then
instead of stepping up and doing the rest you argue that falling out of
testing is an indication that it is irrelevant? Come on - grow up!

I take back my endorsement. Please clean up the mess you did with your
accidental one-off relase, and let people that care for long-term and
proper maintenance handle it.

Or do the right thing and *care* for the package!  The whole thing.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: