Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x

["Andrei Emeltchenko" <andrei_emeltchenko@hotmail.com>]

Привет,

я решил проблему немного по-другому:
прочитал тут:
http://community.core-sdi.com/~juliano/dtors-ru.html

про __attribute__ ((constructor))
и инициализировал в конструкторе. Не знаю только, это правильно или нет.

Интересно, что в предыдущем примере не инициализит только как static.

Андрей

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Nefedov.Yuri@jinr.ru>
To: <debian-russian@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x
> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained
> >
> ... skip
>
>
> => gcc-3.2 -pedantic init_test.c
> init_test.c:20: warning: obsolete use of designated initializer with `:'
> init_test.c:21: warning: obsolete use of designated initializer with `:'
> init_test.c:22: warning: ISO C89 forbids compound literals
> init_test.c:22: warning: ISO C forbids casts to union type
> init_test.c:22: initializer element is not constant
> init_test.c:22: (near initialization for `union_table[0]')
>
> comment the line with (union _union1)
>
> => gcc-3.2 -pedantic init_test.c
> init_test.c:20: warning: obsolete use of designated initializer with `:'
> init_test.c:21: warning: obsolete use of designated initializer with `:'
> init_test.c:22: warning: ISO C89 forbids compound literals
>
>   Does it work?
>   Yura.