Re: SHMGET
On 9 Apr 2000, Max Kosmach wrote:
> Date: 9 Apr 2000 06:03:31 -0000
> To: debian-russian@lists.debian.org
> From: Max Kosmach <max@bob.techcen.zgrad.su>
> Subject: Re: SHMGET
>
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 01:56:59AM +0400, Alex V. Melnikov wrote:
> > ðÒÉ×ÅÔ, ÎÁÒÏÄ, Á ÞÔÏ ÔÁËÏÅ shm filesystem?
> > õ ÍÅÎÑ áÐÁÞÅ ÎÅ ÚÁÐÕÓËÁÅÔÓÑ ÇÏ×ÏÒÉÔ ÞÔÏ
> > shm filesystem not mounted.
> > îÉ ÒÁÚÕ ÔÁËÏÇÏ ÏÔ apache ÎÅ ÓÌÙÛÁÌ. üÔÏ ÓÌÕÞÁÊÎÏ ÎÅ ÂÁÇ × ÑÄÒÅ 2.3.ÈÈ?
> > shmget - ÜÔÏ áðé ÄÌÑ ÒÁÂÏÔÙ Ó ÛÁÒÅÄ ÐÁÍÑÔØÀ, Á ÐÒÉ ÞÅÍ ÔÕÔ filesystem?
> îÁ 2.3.xx ÐÅÒÅÅÈÁÌÉ?
> ðÏÚÄÒÁ×ÌÑÍÓ :)
> ïÎÉ ÅÇÏ ÏÞÞÅÎØ ÕÓÉÌÅÎÎÏ ÐÅÒÅÄÅÌÙ×ÁÀÔ ËÁË ÒÁÚ ÐÅÒÅÄ ÒÅÌÉÚÏÍ 2.4 :)
> shmfs - ÏÄÎÁ ÉÚ ÎÏ×Ï××ÅÄÅÎÎÙÈ ×ÅÝÅÊ
> ÒÅÛÅÎÉÅ ÐÒÏÂÌÅÍÙ - ÄÏÂÁ×ÉÔØ × /etc/fstab ÓÔÒÏÞËÕ ×ÉÄÁ
> none /var/shm shm defaults 0 0
It is better to use:
shm /var/shm shm defaults 0 0
Reason: in case of trouble, it is prefferable to see
"shm on /var/shm" instead of "none on /var/shm" in df or mount output.
Same rationales apply to all other "virtual virtual filesystems", like
"proc", "dev" (also new in 2.3), "pts" and more to appear.
>
> ðÏÓÌÅ ÉÓÐÏÌØÚÏ×ÁÎÉÑ ÜÔÏÇÏ ÚÁËÌÉÎÁÎÉÑ :) ×ÓÅ ÏÐÑÔØ ÄÏÌÖÎÏ ÒÁÂÏÔÁÔØ :)
>
> With MBR
> Max
>
> PS. ÎÅ ÐÒÏ×ÅÒÑÌ - 2.3.99pre3 ×ÁÌÉÔÓÑ ÓÒÁÚÕ ÐÏÓÌÅ ÚÁÇÒÕÚËÉ
It works well in 2.3.51.
---
Omer Mussaev mailto:omerm@mercury.co.il Mercurry Interactive/R&D
051-308-214 http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~omer
Reply to: