On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 6:44:49 PM Mountain Standard Time Duck (Debian) wrote: > Quack, > > On 2025-08-17 07:52, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > Only two reverse dependencies are shown: redmine and ruby-actionpack. > > My > > assumption is that ruby-actionpack isn’t actually using it anymore. If > > something that depends on ruby-actionpack does actually use this code > > then we > > should keep it, but if nothing uses it then I would be in favor of > > removing > > the package from Debian. > > I'm in favor of removing it too. I have just uploaded rails 7.2.2.2+dfsg-1, removes the reference to ruby- actionpack-action-caching from debian/control. It turns out this wasn’t actually needed, as it wasn’t a Depends, but a Breaks. I have also file a removal bug against ftp.debian.org: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1115371 I don’t appear to have the necessary permissions to move the repository to the attic. If someone who does have permissions sees this email I would appreciate if you would do so. https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-actionpack-action-caching -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.