Bug#1101902: ruby-cleanroom: Should ruby-cleanroom be removed from unstable?
Source: ruby-cleanroom
Version: 1.0.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com>, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org, 1092691@bugs.debian.org, Package Salvaging Team <team+salvage@tracker.debian.org>
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing ruby-cleanroom from Debian for the following reasons:
BEGIN FIXME
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1092691: ruby-cleanroom: FTBFS: with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error:
* It is not part of bookworm or trixie and is not a key package.
* There are no votes in popcon
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=ruby-cleanroom&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
* There seems to be no active maintainer
This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.
In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate the
RC-bugs listed above.
* If the bug no longer applies, please close it. If it is closed, check
whether the fixed version is correct and adjust if necessary.
* Is the bug really release-critical? If not, please downgrade.
* If the bug still applies, please send a status update at least once a year.
Once the mentioned RC bugs has been acted upon in one way or another,
please close this bug.
In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this
bug report:
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: ruby-cleanroom -- RoM; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-cleanroom
Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned.
In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug.
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Doing so will also prevent automatic reassignment.
Your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative, which
aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a
consistent Git-based workflow.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.19-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Reply to: