[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Redmine - Stop Supporting Multi-Tenancy ( was Re: Redmine 500 Internal Server Error)



On Monday, March 17, 2025 3:57:53 AM Mountain Standard Time Adi Kriegisch wrote:

> Dear Soren, dear Antonio,

>

> thank you very much for all you did in the past and you are

> currently doing to keep a well-shaped version of redmine in Debian!

>

> On Saturday, 15 March 2025 23:34:50 CET Soren Stoutner wrote:

> > Antonio,

> >

> > On Saturday, March 15, 2025 3:28:25 PM Mountain Standard Time

> > Antonio

> Terceiro wrote:

> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:00:57PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:

> > > > 2.  We remove multi-tenancy support from the package.

> > > > Although I

> > > > really like the idea of the multi-tenancy feature, I don’t

> > > > like making changes to Debian packages that diverge this much

> > > > from upstream, precisely because they are hard to maintain.

> > >

> > > This.

> >

> > Thanks for your response.  Unless someone else responds

> > differently, I will proceed down this route next week.

>

> I would very much like to keep that feature as I am heavily using it

> and I also know of quite a few people using it in a very similar

> way.

>

> If there is anything I could help with, I'd gladly pitch in. Taking

> the lead in development is, unfortunately, out of my scope...


Finding someone who can update and maintain the following patch is the only way we can keep this feature.


https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/redmine/-/blob/master/debian/patches/0004-Add-multi-tenancy-support.patch?ref_type=heads


You can read back through this thread for a little information about my experimentation trying to update it before deciding it was beyond my ability.


If nobody steps forward in the next couple of days I will resume the fairly significant task of trying to excise all of the multi-tenancy changes in a way that allows for a safe upgrade of the default instance.


> > > > However, now that we have been shipping this multi-tenancy

> > > > code, I

> > > > really don’t like removing it because it will break some

> > > > current

> > > > installations.

>

> I do really hope, that there will be a future for this tremendously

> useful feature!

>

> Thank you and all the best,

>     Adi



--

Soren Stoutner

soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: