Re: RFC: rails: bookworm-pu: ruby-activerecord vs ruby-arel [was: RFC: ruby-arel: obsolete, remove?]

[Georg Faerber <georg@debian.org>]

Dear team,

Any comments on the mail below?

Thanks,
Georg

On 23-07-29 13:00:20, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Dear team,
> 
> I recently uploaded rails 2:6.1.7.3+dfsg-2 to unstable [1] with the
> following change:
> 
>   * debian/control:
>     - Declare that ruby-activerecord breaks and replaces ruby-arel:
>       it was merged five years ago, is therefore obsolete and to be
>       removed. (Closes: #1038935)
> 
> Please see the bug for details.
> 
> I intend to do a bookworm-pu with the same change, to get ruby-arel
> removed afterwards.
> 
> Is this fine with you? Do you see any potential problems?
> 
> Thanks so much in advance,
> cheers,
> Georg
> 
> 
> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1439401/accepted-rails-26173dfsg-2-source-into-unstable/
>