Am / On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:38:55 +0100 schrieb / wrote Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org>: > I've checked the current sources. Here are some hints: Dear Daniel, I hopefully followed all your hints and also reverted the link-building to libruby2.7-files except the ones that are links themselves. > debian/copyright: > ... > data/webgen/passive_sources/stylesheets/coderay-default.css > very probematic A) The COPYING file only says "LGPL" > without any specific version, B) it actually says that > this file was created I don't see the problem. Of cause it's created, as all the source-files are. The important thing he says in COPYING is that the file "has been generated with the coderay_stylesheet binary and falls under the LGPL." The file itself was added to the source on July 3rd 2009 (see: https://github.com/gettalong/webgen/commits/master/data/webgen/passive_sources/stylesheets/coderay-default.css) and in the file it said at that time: "This file has been generated with the coderay_stylesheet binary from the coderay gem. Copyright by Kornelius Kalnbach, licensed under LGPL - see coderay.rubychan.de" (see: https://github.com/gettalong/webgen/commit/d1dcddefbfe1ade2577db2ace4fff67de47be348#diff-025ef980846aeca1c4bca72e101339031712327c67e64d203508ab1707837be2) He removed this statement in the file itself with commit 05a1d4... on May 17th 2012 but left the statement in the COPYING-file. The 'coderay_stylesheet binary' this statement means is the binary in the ruby-coderay package. Coderay now seems to be licensed with MIT licence, although the debian copyright file still declares it LGPL-2.1. But at least in 2009 it was LGPL licensed. I don't know why Thomas Leitner wanted the coderay produced css file also licensed by LGPL but he wanted it. LGPL exists since 1991 and started with version 2.0. Since 1999 exists version 2.1 and since 2007 also version 3.0. So I think it's o.k. to assume that in 2009 this statement means at least version 2.1. So I changed my copyright passage to: Files: data/webgen/passive_sources/stylesheets/coderay-default.css Copyright: © 2003-2021 Thomas Leitner (This file has been generated with the coderay_stylesheet binary and falls under the LGPL) License: LGPL-2.1 Hopefully this works and lintian will not grumble about it. If not from my point of view the package would be ready. Oh, I just see: The reprotest job failed once more because in the second build there was a test-error, which I literally don't understand (my French fails): " 1) Failure: TestTidy#test_static_call [/tmp/reprotest.Xp4Lp0/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/test/webgen/content_processor/test_tidy.rb:32]: Expected /inserting missing/ to match "W, [2022-02-22T18:40:46.634660 #18048] WARN -- : Tidy reported problems for </test>: Ligne: 1 Col: 1 - Avertissement:ajout d'un élément 'title' manquant\nW, [2022-02-22T18:40:46.870987 #18048] WARN -- : Tidy reported problems for </test>: Ligne: 1 Col: 1 - Avertissement:déclaration <!DOCTYPE> manquante\nW, [2022-02-22T18:40:46.871083 #18048] WARN -- : Tidy reported problems for </test>: Ligne: 1 Col: 1 - Avertissement:texte brut n'est pas permis dans les éléments <head>\nW, [2022-02-22T18:40:46.871102 #18048] WARN -- : Tidy reported problems for </test>: Ligne: 1 Col: 1 - Avertissement:insertion implicite de <body>\nW, [2022-02-22T18:40:46.871114 #18048] WARN -- : Tidy reported problems for </test>: Ligne: 1 Col: 1 - Avertissement:ajout d'un élément 'title' manquant\n"." Any Idea? A little bit frustrated Klaumi ----- Klaumi Klingsporn mail: klaumikli@gmx.de web: www.klaumikli.de
Attachment:
pgpezjHVGyMOt.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP