Re: RFC: pry 0.13.0 upload to experimental?
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:24:11 +0900,
Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020, ഏപ്രിൽ 2 6:46:51 AM IST, Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org> wrote:
> >
> >I'll upload pry 0.13.0 into unstable.
> >Thanks for your commit.
>
> Did you also fix the two broken packages mentioned by Daniel ?
I think no need to be special care.
- ruby-gurad: Fixed upstream
https://github.com/guard/guard/issues/953
and already released new upstream v2.16.2. Need upgrade usuall way.
- ruby-pry-byebug:
As I checked, ruby-pry-byebug v3.9.0 seems fine with pry 0.13.0.
Current ruby-pry-byebug in unstable is bit old (v3.7.0), Need upgarde
usuall way. But tihs package is under different team umbrella
(Freexian Packaging Team).
Best,
Youhei
> >On April 2, 2020 9:48:52 AM Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> pry currently fails to build in unstable because ruby-method-source
> >was updated
> >> recently to version 1.0. pry 0.13.0 supports this version and builds
> >fine now.
> >> However it breaks ruby-guard (<< 2.16.2) and ruby-pry-byebug (<<
> >3.9.0). The
> >> other reverse dependencies build and/or test fine. The mentioned
> >versions have
> >> been released with support for pry 0.13 and could therefor be
> >uploaded. However
> >> I have no idea if they could break more things. So should pry 0.13 go
> >to
> >> experimental now? Or shall we dicuss this on Friday?
> >>
> >> Regards, Daniel
--
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
<uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
Reply to: