Hi Andrew, all, On 30/12/19 10:25 am, Andrew Lee wrote: > Hi Hector, Lucas and other ruby team members, > > I've already made OBS 2.10.1 package builds in `wip/alee/2.10.1` branch on > salsa.d.o. This package is currently not suitable for release. And still > need a lot of tests and polish. So that I write this email to request for > help hands. > > As we talked at ruby bof at DebConf, that we may embedded gems if needed. > So that I dropped our hacks and re-packaged this package to use mostly the > same set of gems that OBS upstream uses. This way, we may have the security > support and bug fixes support from upstream. > > Please help to review if any `gems` that we already have the same version > available in Debian or will be in Debian soon. So that we may drop the > embedded gem and use the package instead. I took a look and was surprised to see the number of gems that were embedded :) Anyway, I uploaded ruby-haml-rails to match the version of the gem that was embedded, it can now be removed \o/ Also, there are many gems that can be worked upon (but with care) to, at least, lessen the numbers there :) Alternatively, for some, you can patch the Gemfile or/and package.json to match the version in the archive. Of course, it needs a little work and patience to test each time. Furthermore, there's a more neater way to embed a gem or a module. See this[1] commit for instance. And you can add components for OBS likewise, too. Hope that helps? Best, Utkarsh --- [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gitlab/commit/01d2d8b829f8b3420d39c0edbf4716ee5a6a44f0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature