[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems




On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 12:28:52 AM IST, Kiran Skunjumon <kiranskunjumon80@gmail.com> wrote:
>their is two gem parser and ruby_parser.
>In debian ruby_parser is packaged under ruby-parser instead of
>ruby-ruby-parser.
>parser is a dependency of unparser .
>now i am stuck

I think we can use the github username (like we did earlier and a common practice for forks) to create a unique name for the new package. So we can package parser gem as ruby-whitequark-parser.

>On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:43 PM Pirate Praveen
><praveen@onenetbeyond.org>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> rubocop 0.74 in experimental requires ruby gem named "parser" but
>> ruby-parser package include "ruby_parser" gem. Any ideas to move
>> forward?
>>
>> Should we package both gems?
>>
>> Praveen
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Reply to: