Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit

To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
From: Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:36:24 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 4BEEF744-194B-404C-931F-D722150953F6@onenetbeyond.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] B38AE067-9E4B-4A68-8336-E9BDF067E634@onenetbeyond.org>
References: <[🔎] CAOAkg3zLUO7E7H06C=-xt4EwU7=xBkyWsLJ6X6N5HFmPXSWTRw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 5e15f34f-25ce-2a8d-3322-29bbf5cef6fe@gmail.com> <[🔎] B38AE067-9E4B-4A68-8336-E9BDF067E634@onenetbeyond.org>


On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 22 12:16:35 PM IST, Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
>If some one already has ruby-sawyer 0.8.1 installed, updating
>ruby-sawyer in the archive alone will not pull the updated version. So
>we need to bump minimum version of ruby-sawyer in ruby-octokit and
>minimum version of ruby-octokit in gitlab.
>

Alternatively if ruby-addressable had Breaks: ruby-sawyer (<= 0.8.1-3~) then it'd have pulled new ruby-sawyer automatically.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply to:

References:
- RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
  - From: Samyak Jain <samyak.jn11@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
  - From: Utkarsh Gupta <guptautkarsh2102@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
  - From: Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
Next by Date: Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
Next by thread: Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread