Hi Cédric, all, On 18-03-04 22:04:46, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency > > checking looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a > > factory_bot. > > > > I don't know if it is better to fix factory-girl-rails gemspecs, or > > to ship also the factor_girl.gemspec file too with ruby-factory-bot. > > Hm, I'm not really sure how to deal with this, as I already (tried?) > to describe in one of my initial mails: Not only to name changed, but > also code within, and no "compat helper / level" was introduced. This > means, that code which depends on factory_girl needs to change as > well. Upstream described the necessary steps regarding this [1]. > > Given these circumstances, I'm not really sure if using 'Replaces' in > d/control and providing a transitional package is the right way to go. > > What about introducing ruby-factory-bot as a new package without > 'Breaks', 'Replaces' and a transitional package, and removing > ruby-factory-girl once all upstreams of the reverse dependencies have > changed to ruby-factory-bot? > > FWIW: I could also introduce / prepare ruby-factory-bot-rails, as this > was renamed as well. > @Pirate: Asking you, because currently you're listed as the only > uploader: Would this help, any opinion? Personally, I'm not sure if > this is needed at all, given there are no rdepends. > > Cheers, > Georg > > > [1] > https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_bot/blob/4-9-0-stable/UPGRADE_FROM_FACTORY_GIRL.md Friendly ping, I would like to get this done.. Any further input on this? Cheers, Georg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature