On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 02:13:47PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:32:25PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: [...] > > > > I am considering adding Digest::SHA256 to the list of digests tested in > > gem2tgz and skip the checksum computation if the digest name is not a > > key of the hash read from the YAML file. > > > > What do you think? > Looks like this is the way to go. Hi, I've just pushed a branch on Salsa called 'sha_digests' with a proposed change. I've just removed SHA1 and replaced it with SHA256, and check that at least one of SHA256/SHA512 is available in checksums.yaml. https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gem2deb/tree/sha_digests Comments welcome! Cheers, Cédric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature