Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9

To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
From: Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:07:12 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] CAAB-Kcn3FMsFirVQo613RA2d9xAcWSuM1fFWUGX-sHy_MM+PqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20170816184014.el4vjc72hiw65m3k@debian.org>
References: <CAAB-Kcm1Zd2oFkaSP4N-zEVSsJNGqAwQHJiLXD-7dm3=qzaa7w@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAAB-KcnfzpQ3rGdWfm8pvi1-GpbKFO1PC5r-ZOHZh++ygR5udQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20170816184014.el4vjc72hiw65m3k@debian.org>

On 8/16/17, Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> wrote:

> berkshelf must be in testing before being uploaded to backports.

It was when I wrote RFS :)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
  - From: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

References:
- RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
  - From: Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
  - From: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
Next by Date: RFS: a lot off
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
Next by thread: Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread