[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-specinfra 2.66.0-1



On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 12:36:28PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
> points listed on
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
> 
> Could you please sponsor it?
> 
>  ruby-specinfra 2.66.0-1

same issue with the debian/* tag as the other package

this update makes the tests of ruby-serverspec fail¹, while it passes on
current unstable. relevant part of the log:

/usr/bin/ruby2.3 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern spec/type/aix/\*_spec.rb
...WARNING: Using the `raise_error` matcher without providing a specific error or message risks false positives, since `raise_error` will match when Ruby raises a `NoMethodError`, `NameError` or `ArgumentError`, potentially allowing the expectation to pass without even executing the method you are intending to call. Instead consider providing a specific error class or message. This message can be suppressed by setting: `RSpec::Expectations.configuration.on_potential_false_positives = :nothing`. Called from /tmp/autopkgtest-virt-lxc.shared.0_0jnfgn/downtmp/build.9Hn/ruby-serverspec-2.18.0/spec/type/aix/file_spec.rb:19:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'.
F.............

Failures:

  1) File "/etc/passwd" be_mode is not implemented
     Failure/Error:
       expect {
         should be_mode 644
       }.to raise_exception

       expected Exception but nothing was raised
     # ./spec/type/aix/file_spec.rb:19:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: