On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 8:32:06 AM AEST Antonio Terceiro wrote: > I can point you to countless examples of applications written Perl and > Python whose libraries can be loaded from the global namespace, or Perl > and Python libraries that also provide executables. I think it is not about exceptions from the rule but general attitude. I have impression that other teams aim to ship/isolate libraries in appropriate binary packages, at least for new packages. Here apparently I've been specifically advised not to do so... > of course sometimes this is overlooked, as seems to be the case of > ruby-fission; but most of the over a thousand of Ruby packages are in the > right bucket. Of course they are. Most of those libraries are just libraries without executables hence there is no package split dilemma... -- Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov. --- There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion. -- Winston Churchill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.